![]() ![]() I have a streaming event I’m supposed to dj some music for on Saturday and have been spending the past couple weeks and $100 for loopback to remedy what was perfectly running for 3 live dj streams before macs audio midi setup decided to just stop working correctly, I need some help with routing if anyone has the time. When I press the monitor icon in traktor to engage my headphone monitoring the audio layers over my output in loopback out to obs but I don’t hear the monitored audio in my speakers. I went to record a dj set in obs and both my headphone monitor (running out of channels 1-2 by default on my interface) and my main output (channels 3/4) are being recorded into obs as one audio.įor some reason the only audio source coming out of my interface in loopback is coming through channels 11/12 so I have those running into output channels 1/2 on loopback and audio is coming through. I may have acted to hastily because I purchased the program after it seemed to work fine but I forgot to do a recording test. Audio was coming into obs again when I tested the demo. I sprung for loopback because it seemed to remedy the problem. No matter what I ran through it, the audio failed to connect into obs and the logs were showing it was the culprit. So my audio midi setup on my Mac was causing my issues of being able to connect to obs. I am still having trouble getting Traktor to send to the ADAT outputs, so it looks like an application-specific issue.I need some help with routing from someone familiar with loopback. And vise-versa if I change the clock rate in my software, the MOTU Audio Set Up and the 828 itself register the change. ![]() The software seems to communicate directly with the 828 (driver?) so that if I change the clock rate in MOTU Audio Set Up, the software registers the change. It makes sense that the unit can't send audio if there is not a successful link established.)Īs you guys said, there is no need to set a master clock somewhere. So for anybody experimenting, keep that in mind. It looks like the ADAT cable has to be connected on both ends, to successfully handshake a link, before Cuemix FX will give you an ADAT meter output. The MOTU was a little wonky with Ableton Live, I had to switch the sample rate, to "wake up" the ADAT outputs, but everything worked as expected after that. The external cable is necessary, to keep all the channels discreet (rather than funneling into a single, virtual stereo return). So, I did successfully get a loopback from ADAT A output into ADAT B input, using an external cable. Finally got around to doing this, after many months. (anybody remember if an ADAT cable is included in the packaging? Before I sift through boxes of archived cables.) On the front panel, the only indication of ADAT status is under the clock section, so maybe successful clock sync IS a prerequisite for any signal whatsoever? I wonder if the ADAT output needs to confirm a destination before the CueMix monitor will register signal passing? Ableton looks happy, says it is sending successfully to ADAT (green meters, not purple). I just tried using Ableton to output to the ADAT outputs, and similar issue. I also thought the 828 could do internal re-routing between outputs and inputs, but using an optical cable isn't so bad. So I think I have a problem between my source program (Traktor) and the 828. Sorry if I glossed the capacities of CueMix instead of the 828.īut when I pull up CueMix to monitor the inputs, using the metering page, which shows every single input and output, I'm not showing any digital signal whatsoever. That's my understanding of CueMix as well - just a software GUI for the internals of the 828. For example, in the 828 Mk 3, you can select any pair of outputs and have them route back to a virtual pair called Stereo Return which you can then use as an input source in an application. In some MOTU devices there are facilities in MOTU Audio Setup (not Cuemix) to route some outputs back to virtual inputs. You can assign an output channel in an application to a MOTU hardware output, assign and input channel in another application to a MOTU hardware input, and physically connect the MOTU output to the MOTU input, but none of that needs Cuemix. And additionally, as far as I know, Cuemix has no idea what is going on in your audio applications, and it works the same way whether or not you even have an audio application running. All of this works without Cuemix running. The link between the MOTU interface and the applications on the Mac are handled by Core Audio and things like the Bundles window in DP, not Cuemix. It's best thought of as a software that controls hardware (the mixer in a MOTU interface) that resides outside of your Mac. ![]() It routes audio around the mixer internal to the MOTU hardware unit it addresses, simulating the controls on a hardware digital mixer. Maybe there's some confusion about Cuemix.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |